“Have patience with everything that remains unsolved in your heart. Try to love the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books written in a foreign language. Do not now look for the answers. They cannot now be given to you because you could not live them. It is a question of experiencing everything. At present you need to live the question. Perhaps you will gradually, without even noticing it, find yourself experiencing the answer, some distant day.” -Rilke
Showing posts with label Love. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Love. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Sunday, July 21, 2013
To Be Determined
1.
My lovely dances in the moonlight
always moving, an image of fluidity
and grace. She always dances to a
specific rhythm and beat. Nothing
can stop her and her indomitable
spirit. Her dance is a fight, a cry, a
raging against the sadness and the
deadness of the world today. My
lovely dances in the moonlight.
2.
Oh, oh, look in the mirror young
one. Oh,
tell me what you see. See a light
shining in your eyes as you try to
smile. Those glittering moments
when you can see past the evil,
past the dark,
are fleeting. There and gone and
back again like a ghost that never
can or ever will quit.
3.
Not sure what this all means or even
stands for. Not really sure I want to.
But I can't say I never will know. To
search and wonder and pray and breathe
and sleep, that is the fullness of life. To
feel the curve of your lovers body on yours
and the smell of their sweat is the fullness
of being.
4.
I sit, silently.
5.
God, the silence that speaks, through whom
and in whom and by whom we live, move,
and have our being.
Not sure what this all means or even
stands for. Not really sure I want to.
But I can't say I never will know. To
search and wonder and pray and breathe
and sleep, that is the fullness of life. To
feel the curve of your lovers body on yours
and the smell of their sweat is the fullness
of being.
4.
I sit, silently.
5.
God, the silence that speaks, through whom
and in whom and by whom we live, move,
and have our being.
Sunday, July 7, 2013
Quotes
"Generally speaking, women aren't very promiscuous. Males, by contrast, are extraordinarily slutty. And if that's the case, then why are women rather than men called sluts?
A psychological study in this regard. A group of researchers had attractive assistants approach men and women of the opposite sex on a college campus. After a few minutes of chit chat the assistant would sexually proposition the student. The question was, what percent of women would agree to have sex with an attractive man after a few minutes of conversation? And what percent of men would agree to have sex with an attractive woman after a few minutes of conversation?
Seventy-five percent of the males agreed to have sex. The women?
Zero percent.
Generally speaking, women are choosy and discriminating when it comes to sex. Men not so much.
In short, from an empirical standpoint men are the whores.
And if that's the case, why are women always cast as whores, even in the bible, as the sexually insatiable ones?
It is a product of Freudian projection. Throughout history, religiously conservative males have had to confront one of the greatest sources of their moral failure: the male libido. The male libido--the fact that men are sluts--is a sore spot of any male community wanting to pursue purity and holiness. And what has happened, by and large, is that rather than admit that males struggle mightily in the sexual realm, males have externalized the blame and projected their libido onto women. Rather than blaming themselves for sexual sin males have, throughout history, blamed women for being temptresses. The Whore was created to be the scapegoat to preserve male self-righteousness. Rather than turning inward, in personal and collective repentance, men could blame women, blame the whores, for their sexual and moral failures. It's not our fault, the men say, it's the whore's fault.
Examples of this sort of projection are too numerous to list. Christian campuses and youth group talks are full of this sort of stuff.
But let me bring this back to whores and brides in Revelation. Given the problematic nature of this metaphor, how are we to approach these images in the bible?
I'll tell you what I do. For me, I don't read the Whore as a woman. I read it as the Freudian projection it is. The Whore is the male libido projected onto women.
More simply, when I see the Whore in Revelation I don't see a woman.
I see a man."
A psychological study in this regard. A group of researchers had attractive assistants approach men and women of the opposite sex on a college campus. After a few minutes of chit chat the assistant would sexually proposition the student. The question was, what percent of women would agree to have sex with an attractive man after a few minutes of conversation? And what percent of men would agree to have sex with an attractive woman after a few minutes of conversation?
Seventy-five percent of the males agreed to have sex. The women?
Zero percent.
Generally speaking, women are choosy and discriminating when it comes to sex. Men not so much.
In short, from an empirical standpoint men are the whores.
And if that's the case, why are women always cast as whores, even in the bible, as the sexually insatiable ones?
It is a product of Freudian projection. Throughout history, religiously conservative males have had to confront one of the greatest sources of their moral failure: the male libido. The male libido--the fact that men are sluts--is a sore spot of any male community wanting to pursue purity and holiness. And what has happened, by and large, is that rather than admit that males struggle mightily in the sexual realm, males have externalized the blame and projected their libido onto women. Rather than blaming themselves for sexual sin males have, throughout history, blamed women for being temptresses. The Whore was created to be the scapegoat to preserve male self-righteousness. Rather than turning inward, in personal and collective repentance, men could blame women, blame the whores, for their sexual and moral failures. It's not our fault, the men say, it's the whore's fault.
Examples of this sort of projection are too numerous to list. Christian campuses and youth group talks are full of this sort of stuff.
But let me bring this back to whores and brides in Revelation. Given the problematic nature of this metaphor, how are we to approach these images in the bible?
I'll tell you what I do. For me, I don't read the Whore as a woman. I read it as the Freudian projection it is. The Whore is the male libido projected onto women.
More simply, when I see the Whore in Revelation I don't see a woman.
I see a man."
Richard Beck
Friday, July 5, 2013
John Donne Poem
Part of a poem about Jesus.
By miracles exceeding power of man,
He faith in some, envy in some begat,
For, what weak spirits admire, ambitious hate :
In both affections many to Him ran.
But O ! the worst are most, they will and can,
Alas ! and do, unto th' Immaculate,
Whose creature Fate is, now prescribe a fate,
Measuring self-life's infinity to span,
Nay to an inch. Lo ! where condemned He
Bears His own cross, with pain, yet by and by
When it bears him, He must bear more and die.
Now Thou art lifted up, draw me to Thee,
And at Thy death giving such liberal dole,
Moist with one drop of Thy blood my dry soul.
By miracles exceeding power of man,
He faith in some, envy in some begat,
For, what weak spirits admire, ambitious hate :
In both affections many to Him ran.
But O ! the worst are most, they will and can,
Alas ! and do, unto th' Immaculate,
Whose creature Fate is, now prescribe a fate,
Measuring self-life's infinity to span,
Nay to an inch. Lo ! where condemned He
Bears His own cross, with pain, yet by and by
When it bears him, He must bear more and die.
Now Thou art lifted up, draw me to Thee,
And at Thy death giving such liberal dole,
Moist with one drop of Thy blood my dry soul.
Monday, July 1, 2013
Gay and Beautiful and a Little Thing Called Love
I really do love the
Supreme Court sometimes. Sometimes they make decisions which make sense; also, they're really good at instigating conversation. And with the overturning of
parts of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) it's started a revitalization of
the marriage debate. It has also managed to bring out the Christians in full
force. "Oh no! America is going to hell! Go back to God!" are the
cries of our wonderful Christians. But guess what? It's doing nothing. Nothing
whatsoever.
I
understand. But seriously? Running to Leviticus 19? If you're a Christian and
you use Leviticus as your go to reason for why gays shouldn't be allowed to
marry your hermeneutic is rather pathetic. Picking a verse, at random, from the
Old Testament Law will not do. Be consistent. If you take this verse, which is
not only moral but explicitly civil in nature (who else is going to enforce the
death penalty for gays?), you need to take more. Oh, but you say: "There
are different types of Laws in the Old Testament." Of course there are.
But not in the sense you mean (moral, civil, and those relating to the
sacrificial system). There is no clear indication that the Bible, in the OT or
NT, ever delineates such a distinction. So unless you're a theonomist, which
most Christians are not, don't run to the OT Law. But what about Romans 1? and
1 Corinthians 6? Both of these have a context and neither of these tell us what
the government can or cannot do.
But the
fundamental problem is how we as Christians respond. As Rachel Held Evans so
aptly states, "But it
reminded me of one important, reality-based fact: Most people begin to
recognize their sexual orientation when they are just kids, when they are young
and vulnerable like this little girl. So when
we, in the Church, discuss homosexuality as though it were an issue faced by
“other people” who are “out there,” when we resort to stereotypes and language
about hell and judgment and damnation, we may be doing serious damage to the
most precious and vulnerable among us. Even our casual conversations with one
another can be picked up by little ears and internalized in destructive
ways." And her point stands validly. Go to almost any
gay person and ask them when they realized they were gay you will get an answer
that varies from young child to teen years. Either way one takes it words have
consequences. Am I saying that if you have a conviction that being gay or gay
action is wrong that's fine and wonderful. Consider, though, how you go about
sharing this belief. Will you damn gays and call them abominations simply to be
faithful to the Biblical witness? Or will you love them and say it a manner
that admits you're just as much a worthless sinner as they? Because, frankly,
all it sounds like from my side of the pew is a bunch of pissed off white
Christians who think America is going to hell. They seem to be more concerned
with America than with people and loving them. That pesky ol' second greatest
commandment, right?
So, seriously. Get off your high
horse. Get into the streets. Pray. Love. Interact. The Incarnation of Jesus
demands that we as Christians live as part of this world, that the bodies we
have are clean, that the Creation is healing and groaning to be fully restored,
and that we must live separately. And stop focusing on that last point
without the others. Because when you do, when you "hope all things"
in people they have opportunity and you can grow and learn.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)